Most revision is re-reading, which feels productive and changes nothing.

Around recall and around your own errors, not around covering the syllabus again in order. Revise a chapter by attempting questions cold and seeing what breaks, then fix what broke — re-reading the theory first tells you only that it looks familiar, which it will whether or not you can use it.

Very little new syllabus, one full mock a week with the analysis done properly, and the rest of the time split between spaced revision of chapters you have covered and targeted work on whatever the mocks keep surfacing. The plan that fails is the one that tries to finish everything.

Rarely, and only for a high-weightage chapter you have genuinely never touched. Inside the last two months the return on accuracy and revision is far higher than on new material, because you are recovering marks you are already capable of earning instead of gambling on marks you might learn to earn.

Practice is the revision. The useful split is not reading-versus-solving but blind-versus-assisted: attempt cold first, and only open the theory for the specific thing that failed. That way every hour of revision is aimed at a gap you have proven exists.